Rename project from wireframe to packeteer

Decided on the name after weighing alternatives in NAMES.md: packeteer
(packet + -eer, "one who wields packets") fit the project's actual
scope better than the wire/frame pun once it had grown into full
L2-L7 dissection, reassembly, checksums, privilege dropping, and dual
TUI/GUI frontends. No existing packet-capture project uses the name;
the one real-world collision (Packeteer, Inc., a networking company
acquired and folded into Blue Coat/Symantec by 2008) is long defunct.

Mechanical rename throughout: CMake project/target names, the
wireframe:: namespace and include/wireframe/ directory (git mv,
history preserved), every #include path, CLI/GUI help text, and the
project's own working directory. NAMES.md rewritten to record the
decision instead of leaving stale self-referential etymology behind
from the blind rename pass.

Verified after every step: full rebuild (all four targets, no
warnings) and the full test suite (128/128 cases, 366/366 assertions)
both from a fresh reconfigure and again after the directory move.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/tests/test_privileges.cpp b/tests/test_privileges.cpp
index 287d654..99951b8 100644
--- a/tests/test_privileges.cpp
+++ b/tests/test_privileges.cpp
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #include <doctest/doctest.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
 
-#include "wireframe/privileges.hpp"
+#include "packeteer/privileges.hpp"
 
 // The actual drop sequence (setuid/setgid) can only be meaningfully
 // exercised by literally running as root, which a unit test shouldn't
@@ -14,5 +14,5 @@
 // touch privileges it doesn't have.
 TEST_CASE("drop_privileges_if_root is a no-op when not running as root") {
     if (geteuid() == 0) return;  // this test only makes sense unprivileged
-    CHECK_FALSE(wireframe::drop_privileges_if_root().has_value());
+    CHECK_FALSE(packeteer::drop_privileges_if_root().has_value());
 }