From c180bfc34e4c74ba7cac9e0220e9c172c239fe71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: srdusr <99972264+srdusr@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 16:22:00 +0200 Subject: Split crates/x11/src/lib.rs (925 lines) into platform/ Pure reorganization, no behavior change - verified by diffing the function-name and struct/trait-name sets before/after (both identical) plus a full cargo test pass. lib.rs is now a thin shim (mod declaration + pub use), same pattern crates/config used, since a crate root can't itself become a directory. platform/mod.rs keeps the atom table, Frame/X11Platform's struct definitions, the small free-function helpers (err, modmask_for_keycode_in_mod_slots, rgb_to_pixel), and the ClonedForRender trait+impl. The rest splits by concern: - connect.rs: connect, keymap/modifier helpers, grab_keybindings. - window.rs: manage_new_window and the other per-client lifecycle methods (window_title/class, supports_wm_delete, unmanage, frame_for). - events.rs: handle_event, the X11 event-dispatch loop. - actions.rs: raise_and_focus/request_close/sync_geometry/ redraw_all_decorations. - trait_impl.rs: `impl Platform for X11Platform` - named to avoid clippy's module_inception lint, since the containing directory is already named `platform`. - tests.rs: unsplit, same reasoning as every other split this pass. A handful of X11Platform methods (frame_for, manage_new_window, unmanage, raise_and_focus, request_close, sync_geometry, keycode_to_keysym, modifiers_from_state, handle_event) went from private to pub(super): called across what are now sibling submodules, which Rust's privacy model doesn't let see each other's private items. --- crates/x11/src/platform/tests.rs | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) create mode 100644 crates/x11/src/platform/tests.rs (limited to 'crates/x11/src/platform/tests.rs') diff --git a/crates/x11/src/platform/tests.rs b/crates/x11/src/platform/tests.rs new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61d8124 --- /dev/null +++ b/crates/x11/src/platform/tests.rs @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ + use super::*; + + /// Builds a flattened `GetModifierMappingReply.keycodes`-shaped slice: + /// 8 slots (Shift, Lock, Control, Mod1..Mod5) of `per` keycodes each, + /// zero-padded, with `assignments` placing one real keycode into + /// specific slots. + fn modmap(per: usize, assignments: &[(usize, u8)]) -> Vec { + let mut v = vec![0u8; per * 8]; + for &(slot, kc) in assignments { + v[slot * per] = kc; + } + v + } + + #[test] + fn finds_numlock_on_mod2_the_common_case() { + let keycodes = modmap(2, &[(4, 77)]); // slot 4 == Mod2 + assert_eq!(modmask_for_keycode_in_mod_slots(77, 2, &keycodes), ModMask::M2); + } + + #[test] + fn finds_numlock_on_mod5_an_uncommon_but_real_layout() { + let keycodes = modmap(2, &[(7, 90)]); // slot 7 == Mod5 + assert_eq!(modmask_for_keycode_in_mod_slots(90, 2, &keycodes), ModMask::M5); + } + + #[test] + fn ignores_the_keycode_if_it_only_appears_in_shift_lock_or_control() { + // A keycode bound to Lock (e.g. Caps Lock's own keycode) must never + // be mistaken for Num Lock - only slots 3..8 (Mod1..Mod5) count. + let keycodes = modmap(2, &[(1, 66)]); // slot 1 == Lock + assert_eq!(modmask_for_keycode_in_mod_slots(66, 2, &keycodes), ModMask::from(0u16)); + } + + #[test] + fn keycode_zero_never_matches_even_if_a_slot_is_unpadded_zero() { + // Unused modifier slots are zero-padded, so keycode 0 must never + // resolve to a mask - otherwise a keyboard with no Num Lock key at + // all would spuriously "find" it in the first empty slot. + let keycodes = modmap(2, &[]); + assert_eq!(modmask_for_keycode_in_mod_slots(0, 2, &keycodes), ModMask::from(0u16)); + } + + #[test] + fn no_match_anywhere_returns_empty_mask() { + let keycodes = modmap(2, &[(3, 50)]); + assert_eq!(modmask_for_keycode_in_mod_slots(99, 2, &keycodes), ModMask::from(0u16)); + } -- cgit v1.2.3